Comparing images from Jan. 21 and April 25, there is a clear missing area of rainforest close to the state’s capital city of Porto Velho. Each of the areas highlighted represents a total area of about 1 square mile, with a total loss of land measuring roughly 448 football fields.

The Brazilian Climate Observatory said the deforestation was conducted in a hot spot for illegal deforestation, though NBC News could not confirm if the deforestation found in the images was illegal.

As Brazil comes to terms with a mounting death toll and its status as one of the new global epicenters of the coronavirus struggle, efforts to combat deforestation have been complicated by a depleted workforce at its main environmental protection agency, the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Ibama), according to environmentalists and one of its former heads.

Increasingly plagued by criticism of his handling of the pandemic, as well as ongoing corruption allegations, Bolsonaro has responded by deploying the armed forces to protect the Amazon.

Bolsonaro’s critics, however, argue that his pro-development rhetoric and dismantling of Ibama through budget cuts and the firings of key officials since he took office in January 2019 have only fueled the desire of loggers, ranchers and miners to take advantage of the unprecedented health crisis.

“The storyline that the central government is sending out basically passes on a message that, ‘you’re free to go, my friend, you can do whatever you want and we’re not gonna bother you…’ that’s definitely influencing deforestation,” Guimarães added.

Suely Araujo, who resigned as head of Ibama last year in protest against Bolsonaro’s attacks on the agency, detailed a culture of interference and harassment from the central government as she sounded the alarm at the latest move to transfer power over environmental operations in the Amazon to the military.

“Environmental inspection is much more sophisticated than putting men on the field,” she said. “This decision by the president subordinates environmental agents to the army.”

She added: “The government has a vision regarding the Amazon that dates back to the 1970s: occupation accompanied by environmental degradation. This is very sad.”

The Brazilian government did not respond to a request for an interview. The Bolsonaro administration has previously rejected criticism of its environmental record, insisting it is committed to conservation.

Sarah Shenker, a researcher from Survival International, an organization which campaigns for the rights of indigenous people, said she and her colleagues are “receiving messages every day” from communities in the Amazon living in fear of the twin threat of the coronavirus: infection and invasion.

“The invaders are thinking that they can get away with these invasions with impunity even more than they could before because the eyes of the world and others are on the coronavirus,” she said. “That’s something that indigenous peoples are really trying to fight hard against at the moment.”

The situation could soon deteriorate further, with a pandemic-induced recession potentially incentivizing deforestation and the Bolsonaro administration still attempting to push new laws through Congress, which environmentalists say would weaken safeguards against the incursion into indigenous lands.

Activists are also fearful of the imminent fire season — predicted to be even more devastating than last year’s because of rampant deforestation — and the impact on a health care system already overwhelmed by the coronavirus.

Reflecting on what he described as the “perfect storm” of environmental, health and political threats looming over the Amazon, Guimarães said: “It was urgent last year. This year is urgent multiplied by seven fold. We have to stop the deforestation in the Amazon now. Now. Not yesterday. Not tomorrow, not the day after tomorrow. Now.”